Evidence
What the verdicts stand on — and how you can check it all yourself without taking our word for anything.
The firsthand account in Shaw v. Mwale
The strongest evidence in the record is not secondhand: the plaintiffs in Shaw v. Mwale (No. 1:24-cv-00122, D. Utah) describe visiting the Kenyan project themselves in August 2022, after paying the Mwales approximately $1.7 million. Their sworn complaint states:
“The hospital, previously represented as the world’s largest and most advanced, was a complete construction mess – as it had been… for more than five years. Only one wing of the hospital was working, with only a run-down clinic on the first floor, primarily treating children from surrounding schools for malaria.”
The complaint adds that the hospital had no cancer treatment facility, the golf course greens had no holes, and the “rental homes” were vacant 10×10 concrete boxes — and calls the hospital “simply a shell” and “a mere ruse.” These are the plaintiffs’ allegations, made in a filed federal complaint — verifiable through PACER under case number 1:24-cv-00122.
Published imagery
Verify it yourself in 15 minutes
- Pull the complaint on PACERCase No. 1:24-cv-00122, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. Read paragraphs 55–70 for the Kenya visit.
- Check the eviction filingsCase No. N24-2030, Contra Costa County Superior Court — the lease terms and the $522,663.46 declaration.
- Look at the site from abovePublic satellite imagery of the Kakamega County project area lets anyone compare the “world’s largest hospital” claim with what stands on the ground.
- Ask for the documentsAsk anyone repeating the 5,000-bed or $60-billion claims for a single verifiable document. Note what comes back.
Have evidence that confirms or contradicts a verdict — documents, photos, firsthand knowledge? Send it in. Verdicts are updated publicly when the record changes.